Why air freight markets are becoming more localized

Concentrated demand is creating uneven air freight conditions

Air freight markets remain relatively balanced between supply and demand as August begins, but that balance is not uniform across all origins or commodities. Capacity is available across much of the network, demand is stable on several major trade lanes, and pricing pressure has eased in parts of Asia and Europe. At the same time, demand tied to artificial intelligence (AI) infrastructure is beginning to create more localized pressure in select Asia export markets.

As manufacturers ramp up production of equipment tied to next-generation AI server platforms, air freight demand is expected to increase from Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, and Vietnam into the United States. These shipments are often high value, time sensitive, and tied to deployment schedules. As companies work to bring new AI infrastructure online, air freight is expected to remain a preferred option for some shipments, even where ocean capacity is available.

Shippers outside of the AI server sector may feel the effects if their freight moves through the same origin airports, uses the same carrier capacity, or ships during the same periods as AI-related cargo.

Even shippers exporting similar products to the United States may encounter different conditions, depending on where their freight originates. A company shipping from Taiwan may face a different booking environment than a company shipping from another part of Asia where technology-related demand is not growing at the same pace.

Bottom line: The air freight market is not tightening everywhere. Pressure is becoming more localized around specific origins, commodities, and time-sensitive cargo flows.

Why this demand cycle looks different

Many air-freight demand cycles are broad based. Retail inventory replenishment, seasonal product launches, or post-disruption recoveries often pull capacity for multiple industries at the same time. The current dynamic appears more concentrated around a relatively narrow set of products, manufacturers, and export markets.

For shippers, the distinction matters because local conditions can be harder to separate from regional market averages. Asia may appear balanced overall while individual origins experience tighter capacity, firmer pricing, or longer booking lead times. As demand becomes more concentrated, origin-level conditions may matter more than regional averages when planning air freight.

Shipper impact: Even modest increases in technology-related exports can influence conditions at individual airports and within specific carrier networks, creating sharper effects than broader economic growth would normally produce. Seasonal typhoon activity across Asia could add further volatility if weather-related disruptions coincide with periods of concentrated demand. Origin-level visibility is becoming more important for shipment planning.

Airline capacity may not respond evenly

Historically, relatively small shifts in demand have a larger impact where available air capacity is already limited. If technology-related volumes continue to grow in certain markets, conditions there may begin to develop differently than at nearby origins serving a broader mix of cargo.

If airlines don’t expand capacity, the practical question for shippers is whether capacity then becomes more competitive. A shipper may still be able to secure space, but the booking experience, timing, and rate environment may differ from nearby origins.

Bottom line: Available capacity does not always mean equal access. In local markets, cargo priority and carrier allocation decisions may matter more than the regional capacity picture.

Regional air freight markets are moving in different directions

The regional developments highlighted this month point in different directions. While technology-related demand is drawing attention in certain Asia–U.S. export markets, Asia–Europe conditions have become more competitive, Oceania imports remain active, Australia continues to face freighter capacity constraints, and South America remains supported by ecommerce, perishables exports, and recovering demand in several markets.

Taken together, those differences reinforce a broader point: Air freight markets are not moving in a single direction. In some locations, improving capacity is creating more flexibility. In others, concentrated demand, cargo mix, geopolitical uncertainty, or structural constraints continue to shape pricing and booking conditions.

Fuel costs are also becoming a variable to watch more closely. After easing from earlier highs, jet fuel prices have recently begun moving higher again, prompting at least one major carrier to announce higher fuel and security surcharges effective September. Additional adjustments may be possible if energy markets remain volatile. Even in markets where capacity is available, fuel-related costs can influence how quickly air freight pricing softens.

For shippers, that can make origin, commodity type, and shipment timing just as important as regional supply-and-demand trends. Technology-related demand, weather disruptions, and geopolitical developments all have the potential to create very different outcomes across individual export markets in the months ahead.

Shipper impact: Air freight planning now requires a more granular view of origins, cargo types, timing, and evolving cost drivers.

What air freight shippers can do

• Monitor origin-level conditions, not just regional trends. Demand tied to AI infrastructure is concentrated in a handful of export markets. Conditions in Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, and Vietnam may differ from broader Asia averages.
• Identify where your freight competes with AI-related freight. Shippers that don’t export technology products may rely on the same airports, carriers, and air capacity used by AI-related cargo.
• Expect regional conditions to remain uneven. Asia–Europe markets are softening, while Australia, Oceania, and parts of South America continue to experience firmer conditions.
• Treat cargo characteristics as a market signal. High-value technology, ecommerce shipments, perishables, and other priority cargo may influence air freight conditions differently than general cargo.
• Build in timing flexibility where possible. Localized demand can affect booking windows, available service levels, and rate behavior even when broader regional capacity appears sufficient.

Notable shifts this month

Asia–Europe: Competition for cargo is increasing

Demand has softened compared with the previous month while capacity remains readily available across much of the market. In both Shanghai and Hong Kong, carriers continue to compete for available volumes as demand eases and capacity comfortably meets current needs. Rates have continued to soften, and neither market is showing significant peak-season pressure.

Across Southeast Asia, export demand remains stable but has moderated compared with earlier expectations. Capacity is sufficient across most origins, resulting in a favorable pricing environment and improved booking flexibility. For shippers, that means fewer capacity constraints, more routing options, and greater ability to balance cost and service requirements than earlier in the summer.

Shipper impact: Asia–Europe freight may offer more flexibility than other regional air markets, especially where shippers can compare carrier options and service levels.

Europe–United States: Stability remains the defining theme

Trans-Atlantic markets continue to see industrial, automotive, aerospace, healthcare, and technology demand. Capacity is generally available, though geopolitical developments continue to influence airline planning.

While disruptions in the Middle East remain a consideration, the lane has become less reactive than it was earlier in the year as carriers adjust network planning and contingency measures.

For shippers, execution risks remain important to monitor, but widespread capacity disruption is not currently the defining market dynamic.

Shipper impact: Europe–United States air freight planning can remain relatively steady, but shippers should continue monitoring geopolitical developments that could affect carrier networks or transit reliability.

United States–Australia: Capacity constraints remain the exception

The broader North America export market has remained relatively stable in recent months, but Australia continues to be a notable exception. Lower passenger demand during Australia's winter season has reduced available belly capacity at a time when demand remains strong, making it tougher for cargo that depends on freighter aircraft.

Unlike many other U.S. export markets where conditions have remained steady, capacity in this lane is expected to remain tight through August and potentially beyond. The combination of steady demand and reduced capacity in passenger planes leaves little room for disruption, making early booking decisions more important.

Shipper impact: U.S.–Australia freight may require more advance planning than other North America export lanes, especially for shipments that rely on freighter capacity or have limited service flexibility.

Oceania: A shoulder season that does not feel like one

Import demand into Oceania remains stronger than would typically be expected heading into August, with Asia, Europe, and the United States continuing to generate steady volumes. Shipments for large projects and priority freight are seeing the greatest pricing pressure, while volatility around the Arabian Gulf continues to add another layer of uncertainty.

The market is not behaving like a typical shoulder season. Customers with flexibility around transit times or shipment size may have more options for managing costs, while large or time-sensitive shipments are likely to encounter tighter conditions than would normally be expected this time of year.

Freight that can move in smaller consignments may also have access to a broader range of carrier options and available capacity.

Shipper impact: Shipment size and urgency may have an outsized effect on Oceania air freight options.

South America: Capacity is improving, but demand remains resilient

South America continues to see a diverse mix of demand drivers, including ecommerce imports, recovering volumes in Brazil, growth in Colombia, and steady perishables exports. That broad base of demand is keeping the market active even as conditions soften in other parts of the world.

Additional charters are helping to improve capacity on United States–South America lanes, but not evenly. Major carriers remain disciplined about adding capacity, and constraints persist at key gateways including Buenos Aires (EZE), Lima (LIM), and São Paulo (GRU).

As a result, rates are expected to moderate from second-quarter highs without returning to historical norms. Spot rates are likely to remain above 2025 averages through much of the third quarter, supported by fuel surcharges, operational challenges, and continued demand across multiple sectors.

Shipper impact: South America air freight may become less expensive than recent highs, but persistent demand and gateway constraints could keep conditions firmer than in softer global markets.

How air freight shippers can prepare for the month ahead

• Prioritize freight based on urgency. Separating time-sensitive shipments from freight with more flexible delivery requirements may help improve service and transportation costs.
• Watch a market’s cargo mix, not just capacity. Markets heavy in ecommerce, perishables, technology, or other priority freight may behave differently than markets with more diversified demand patterns.
• Take advantage of competitive Asia-Europe rates.
• Plan earlier for constrained lanes. U.S.–Australia freight, large-size imports to Oceania, and some South America gateways may require more lead time than broader market averages suggest.
• Build flexibility into routing decisions where possible. Alternative carriers, service levels, or gateway options may provide additional opportunities if conditions change.

Table of Contents